Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
you do realize that real proof means going after each person individually
getting access to their hardware and doing an investigation to prove that the file in question was actually on their machine
you can sue on mass and have real proof the two things are mutually exclusive.
|
You just made up your own meaning for the word proof, funny....
When you mass sue, you're doing it individually, you're just filing it all at once, it's not like they did a class action lawsuit against the people.
You do not need access to the computer to prove the person pirated, that's just silly. At that, if it was needed, it would be after the case started, thus they had proof and need more.
This case is not about them mass suing, it's about the misconduct of the action, related to them going after innocent people, without 'any' proof or the evidence they did have, was bogus - so they couldn't back it up.