Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
No I didn't.
If WP can handle any number of domains, sub domains, videos, sets, models, attributes, updates and more. Plus is secure and won't crash, doesn't need to have someone with limited webmastering skills run it. Has technical back up, is installed and tested for you before it's handed over, can be changed to suit the users needs.
Then I guess it's great.
How many videos and sets in the members area of those sites you mentioned?
|
See Paul, you know I like you and I really try to avoid joining the herds when it comes to you, but I don't know why you insist looking like a total ignorant. The post above is so ridiculous it's beyond retarded, there's absolutely no CMS close to WP. Not even one. Not even close. If you try to sell your CMS, just don't be stupid and NEVER, EVER compare it to WP, you'll always lose. And for the record, like The Doc said, WP can do all what you say and then 10000x more. As a matter of fact, there's NOTHING you can't do with WP that I know of. NOTHING. As we are at it, I'd also recommend you not to attack EX to promote your CMS unless you have much more and better features than EX, it's not wise to compare both. You're really doing a disservice to your partner choosing to look like the village's fool
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
But that doesn't make it good for paysites.... actually, it's a pile of shit when it comes to content management. Something could be made for it to make it easier, but it wouldn't be based on any part of the core cms.
|
Well, I know of one that is way better than anything you may know. Like... upload... click... done (and when I say done, I mean all and any kind of media and formats in 30 secs to 1 min, rotating thumbs, auto-creation of posts, etc etc etc)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kolargol
...
|
before you ask and think I left you down with the news, as you may read above, finally it's finished after all these months
