Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey
that if the weather changes, you can call it any way you want, the effects will be the same no matter how you call it. It's just a semantic distinction, nothing else. It's like the city I mentioned which has sub-tropical climate. Yeah sure, but still they had snow.
Or like Paraguay: they have an incredibly torrid climate, totally unbearable. Now they're going crazy because they need stoves for the first time ever and they aren't used to cold temperatures. So yes, they're a tropical country, but "the duck" is freezing cold  |
Still not sure i get your point.
I see this debate as having roughly two sides - there's the science, which few people seem to understand, and then there's the religious politics, which is where most people center their rhetoric.
Arguing from beliefs, as it were. Expressing their politico-religious affiliation.
I personally find the science fascinating, thats the point of view i like to promote, since almost nobody does, here, or anywhere else.
I get the impression you are saying duck law proves global warming is happening?