Quote:
Originally Posted by Caligari
Do you remember just posting this? "he probably was shot because he was going for his gun or made a movement that looked like he was" which is rebuked by the one fact that "No the gun was not fired and was also in a sock." What did he do, go to sneeze?
So it would be apparent to anyone with deductive reasoning that this guy was simply shot to death as part of a police vendetta. The cops knew him and had it in for him.
Judging from your posts I think you made up your mind a long time ago.
|
No-one is disagreeing that the gun wasn't fired but how do you know he was'nt reaching for the gun, was unsheathing it or even tried to use it while still in the sock? Oops have i upset your deductive reasoning?