Quote:
Originally Posted by Caligari
Who is talking about simply reading the forum genius?
How about putting down the comics and reading from news sources?
http://hken.ibtimes.com/articles/194...d-gun-fire.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/au...tives-dead-man
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...nt-mark-duggan
"Initial ballistics tests also suggest that the bullet allegedly fired by Duggan, lodged in a police radio worn by an officer during Thursday's incident, was not from the handgun, according to a report by The Guardian. This evidence points to the fact that police were not facing a fire threat when they shot Duggan, who had been travelling in a minicab.
The police version of the incident said that the officers stopped the cab to carry out an arrest as part of a planned operation, but were forced to shoot Duggan as he started firing."
Caught the police in an outright bullshit lie, but you can go ahead and keep your head firmly planted in your ass. |
That's fascinating, Columbo, but AFAIK the Guardian newspaper does not get to decide what did or did not happen in cases like this. A gun not being fired points to nothing more than the fact that it was not fired. Perhaps you can now address what I wrote, preferably without trawling Google for another bunch of unrelated crap.