Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony
So you haven't been in it, thus negating your fanboy posting generalizing how awesome the car is against the GTR.
Conversely, me not being it detracts from my argument that it's not that awesome for 400k. Wait... What? I need to be in a car to compare performance stats with how much the car is worth? What world do you live in?
My premise has not changed, for the money, the GTR is a better car. I don't need to sit in the LFA to prove that. While your whole argument is because it "SOUNDS" like a race car and it doesn't have the electronics doo dads the GTR has it's worth the 400k. Ummmm, did you miss the part where everything is LCD on the LFA? Fanbois always make me laugh, you get so emotionally wrapped in whatever particular fetish you're in to.
Don't get me wrong, I only laugh cause I've seen it in myself. That's why I can tear apart your whole argument rather easily.
|
I already said in my previous posts that the GTR is probably thee best car in its price range except you might have to fight a few Corvette owners for the title.
My whole point was the LFA is not a bad car just because it is over priced. I say if you take the price out of the equation and just compare the LFA and GTR on every point from stats, aesthetics, driving experience and so on the LFA is the superior car.
Since we are talking about two different perspectives and even though I've agreed with yours, you can't make one post without mentioning cost or fanboy so I'm done with this discussion.
BTW you clearly contradict yourself in the quote in this post
