Quote:
Originally Posted by justinsain
I already said in my previous posts that the GTR is probably thee best car in its price range except you might have to fight a few Corvette owners for the title.
My whole point was the LFA is not a bad car just because it is over priced. I say if you take the price out of the equation and just compare the LFA and GTR on every point from stats, aesthetics, driving experience and so on the LFA is the superior car.
Since we are talking about two different perspectives and even though I've agreed with yours, you can't make one post without mentioning cost or fanboy so I'm done with this discussion.
BTW you clearly contradict yourself in the quote in this post  |
What? The LFA is not a bad car? You've been particularly nutting yourself about how awesome the LFA is over any other car ever made. Your whole argument is based on your fanboy appreciation of the LFA, "If you gave the car away", who the Hell would come up with that argument? When the whole premise is that the car is not worth the 400k. Where did you learn to debate?
I'm not looking at it from a different perspective. I'm looking at it from the facts. For the less than a third of the price, the GTR is a better car, in any performance stats. You keep mistaking my points as an emotional response, which is understandable due to you reacting in that manner.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by justinsain
I like the hard top version better and the LFA will blow the GTR away.
The GTR doesn't even look like an exotic and it sounds like a Dyson vacuum cleaner.
It does have some impressive performance however.
The LFA is sleek and exotic. It will turn heads wherever it goes. The sound it makes is unmistakably exotic. I don't know how the performance stats compare between the two but I'm sure you'd have to take it to the track with a professional driver to find the difference.
Driving the LFA would be a much more exhilarating experience.
|