Quote:
Originally Posted by Shap
It actually wasn't cost cutting. We spent a lot of the last year listening or focusing on what our member's wanted. A lot of what they wanted had less to do with glamourous photos that look great on a magazine cover and had more to do with the depth of the set and explicitness of it. As a result our production team requested and pushed harder for that type of content. I'm not sure which is better. The cost is pretty much the same. I think one (glamourous) sells better and the other fully pleases members better.
|
Interesting. Kind of like the inverse of our situation where people ask for it to be more amateur but then rate the stuff that is less amateur higher...
I certainly give you tons of credit for truly listening to your members - most paysites don't and just assume whatever will do.