This image is interesting.
Notice how the only properties destroyed are those owned by the WTC. The position of WTC 7 and its damage compared to every other building on the perimeter sure is odd.
This photo of the Bankers Trust Building (the closest building to WTC falling debris) illustrates the worse case scenario damage along the perimeter. It appears as though 80% of the offices could have been used the next day.
Now go back and look at the top photo. Should WTC 7, with it's large buffer zone between WTC 1 and itself, have been damaged to the point of total collapse? Why didn't the Bankers Trust Building suffer devastating damage since it was right across the street?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott McD
So, can i ask who knocked it down and why then?
I never get these arguments at all.
|
Look around. Everything happening in the world right now is the result of 9/11. While most of us are upset over the events of the past decade, the world's most powerful people have benefited greatly in this time span.