Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
The towers were in the WTC complex itself, surrounded by the other buildings of the WTC complex. Being as those buildings surrounded the towers, it's obviously logical that the surrounding buildings would have suffered the most damage.
|
WTC 7 was not a surrounding building. There is a large area between it and tower 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Why are you comparing WTC7 with the Bankers Trust Building?
|
It was to illustrate what happened right across the street from WTC 2. It opens the question of why there was very manageable damage along the surrounding perimeter of the complex, yet WTC 7 (located in this perimeter and not next to a tower) fell down.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Why did WTC7 fall and not this other building? Gee, I wonder why. Why don't you question why the buildings next to WTC7 didn't fall? All of the buildings suffered various degrees of damage that day, some more than others.
|
The damage to each building on the perimeter of the complex is predictable when looking at its neighboring buildings. WTC 7, however, is an anomaly. Its damage is very unexpected.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
What do you mean "everything happening in the world right now"? Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. The economic issues we are having isn't because of 9/11, or Afghanistan, but because of the US housing market. What's happening in Libya has nothing to do with 9/11, nor does what's happened in Egypt have anything to do with 9/11. The only thing that 9/11 caused was tight security at airports (and tighter security over all), we invaded Afghanistan, and we are now hunting down terrorists.
|
The same people are manipulating all of this, and they aren't done yet. WW3 is approaching.