Oh, silly Ethersync... don't you listen to the talking heads and the GFY pundits? Ron Paul cant win.
Oh, wait. I know the problem... you can read, unlike most zombies who soak up the media spoon fed lie, and you might know actually that according to Rasumussen Ron Paul polls at 41% compared to Obama's 42% in a direct head-to-head matchup... and that was a year ago when a lot less people even knew Paul's name and the economy at least "appeared" better.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...42_ron_paul_41
A more recent CNN poll shows that Obama currently wins against any Republican, but that Ron Paul has the highest numbers against Obama over any other Republican candidate.
Quote:
According to the poll, taken before the announcement of Osama bin Laden's death, President Barack Obama has an edge over all the top GOP candidates in hypothetical match-ups.
Who does best against Obama? Paul. The congressman from Texas, who also ran as a libertarian candidate for president in 1988 and who is well liked by many in the tea party movement, trails the president by only seven points (52 to 45 percent) in a hypothetical general election showdown. Huckabee trails by eight points, with Romney down 11 points to Obama.
The poll indicates the president leading Gingrich by 17 points, Palin by 19, and Trump by 22 points.
|
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...op-nomination/
So can someone explain to me why "Ron Paul cant win" when he leads all other Republican contenders against Obama, yet people don't make that same criticism about all the other Candidates when they fare much, much worse in a head to head matchup?