Quote:
Originally Posted by Sly
Frankly I don't see how any one party can solely claim the victory. It was a combination of many factors, and it has been very rocky for quite sometime. The last month or so there seems to have been some great victories by the rebels. And that's just it... without the rebels there would be nothing, without NATO there would be nothing, without France there would be nothing, without Italy there would be nothing, without the United States there would be nothing, and so on.
It seems as if the rebels have been more organized as of late and have had a specific focus of taking one city at a time to surround the base. I'm sure that they have plenty of Libyan army defectors guiding them, but it also makes you wonder who else might be in there helping with strategy.
Where this pro-Gaddafi populace is hiding has yet to be seen. When the rebels were chipping away, city by city, where were these loyalists? Libya is crippled. Rebels have won.
|
Who was in office when the Libyan war was started? A Democrat...Therefore Obama gets credit, regardless of how you want to spin it...Obama runs Nato and France and Italy already have to kiss our asses as we are the great empire...
Who is FUNDING those "organized as of late" rebels? Who is providing them ARMS?...That doesn't make me WONDER about shit as I know for a fact it was Obama who is responsible for providing the strategy as he is the current Emperor of this empire. You think France and Italy and NATO are helping just for shits and giggles? Hell no.....They're getting some sort of benefit from this.
And PLEASE outline to me how in the holy hell the Republicans can take ANY credit for this shit.