Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
A tip to those who want to believe this wasn't an inside job, you're going to head into Checkmate within the next couple of moves if you continue with the argument that fire brought down WTC7. This debate can go on for a lot longer if you use a strategy along the lines of "They had to control demolition WTC7 for some legit reason". If you use that one, which is Larry Silverstein's line, you'll be able to continue debating for longer and if you play smartly you might get a Stalemate
Never let it be said that I don't help you official story guys out  |
Silverstein was talking about the fire unit when he said they had to "pull it." It was in reference to getting the unit out of the building.
Although I have over the years considered the possibility of a controlled demolition quickly set up by emergency demolition men (if such a thing even exists). Is it possible that the WTC buildings all had emergency plans to collapse the buildings in the event of a devastating fire? Seems unlikely. The theory obviously has a lot of problems.