Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseudonymous
The only way he might be justified to go out of his way to warn people, is if they are about to rip a bunch of people off. But im sure he doesnt know anyway, as if a program would let their photographer know if they plan on paying people out or not.
If either: they are a ccbill company, they still are going to pay everybody out and eventually shut the doors, it hasn't launched yet or they're putting an end to further production...
then him saying it's not his responsibility is true.
Im just saying no point in speculating unless he gives more detail about the situation or until the situation unfolds. Or else you could be wrongfully accusing a respected photographer, give him the benefit of the doubt.
|
I agree with almost all of the above. The In The Crack photographer was just dragged through the mud and I give him the benefit of the doubt. I'd also certainly give you the benefit of the doubt. I can name a lot of people that whom I'd give the benefit of the doubt. At first, I even gave Dean the benefit of the doubt, but the tone of his second post combined with the pseudo 'above-the-fray' attitude with which he carries himself led me to not give him the benefit of the doubt.