Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
WT7 did not fall at free fall speed for the whole try. This is in the NIST report that you included in your post, but, Even if it did, or even if it did for a short time, this is not proof that it was a controlled demolition. It might look like it, but it's not absolute proof.
Just because WT7 looked like it fell straight down, does not mean that it did. We saw only 1 or 2 angles of the collapse. The cameras were also very far away reducing the amount of detail that could be scene. There is no way, from the views that have been presented, that anyone except the close minded could assume that the building fell in a straight line.
|
There were multiple angles of the fall of the building.
Even if the building fell at freefall for one second, it would be suspicious - but it fell for over 2 seconds. The rest was at near freefall. Nothing causes this except sudden, dramatic removal of all support around the perimiter and support and core.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
And again, if it it fall completely straight, it does not mean that it was a controlled demolition.
|
Unless god opened a hole beneath it or it was a mathematically improbable one-time occurrence, which it wasn't it occurred 3 times that day, it can only mean there were other methods used.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
It is time though to accept the facts and to stop paying any attention to the lunatics out there who believe in something that simply has not been proven to exist.
|
Uh... how has the 9/11 commission or the NIST investigation brought any facts? How has the FBI brought any facts? Really... just post them since they're "factual"..
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
A "Rational person" would NOT think that this or any other building was "brought down for security reasons". This is basic conspiracy theorists nonsense. This has been the basis of the argument for every Truther out there.
|
Actually that's full of shit. The "security reasons" destruction rationale is not endorsed by any rational "truther" - it is not a basic belief of any conspiracy theorist or truther, unless they are the absolute fringe.
Most "truthers" disbelieve the official version, and would like a forensic examination of the event, which hasn't happened yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Destroying a building is a very ineffcient way to destroy information - so much of it would still be left behind, as anyone could plainly see by all of the paper floating around after WTC 1&2. No "Rational" person would ever agree with such a ridiculous claim.
|
Actually the vaults of the CIA, SEC etc which were beneath the WTC were found and photographed empty. The photos were initially released, but then suppressed. The photographer was accused of his wife's murder/suicide, and he had to escape to South America.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Actually, there have been endless rational explanations regarding building 7.
|
Really? Can you link or quote some?
:D