Quote:
Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
Posted in another thread earlier tonight:
As I suspected, there are still some important questions which remain to be answered.
When Dan first announced that there was a positive test result more than a week ago, the industry response was swift and news traveled fast (although not all of it was accurate), which was followed by some people parsing words and engaging in semantics to further confuse matters by suggesting that there was no positive result whatsoever, or that there had never been a positive test of any kind (which we now know was untrue).
Now we are hearing that there may have been more than one false positive test. WTF? 
It will be interesting to see what happens as a result of all of this...
ADG |
Wow, I didn't see that other post from Dan.
If the only negative result is an Elisa test, then that is a pretty stupid and premature point to make press about, as it may be too early to detect the virus with only the Elisa method.
However, that is a GREAT spin to get disinformation out into the mainstream media. Well played.
I don't think I've ever heard of a situation where it's been so difficult to find out if one person has HIV or not. But I guess such shenanigans are to be expected when certain parties are involved.