Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
That doesn't even make sense. But thanks for your "effort"
BTW... in this case, we are comparing an object that weighs 5.25 oz's and an object that weighs 6095 times more.
Take 6 hours off and put a cold towel on your forehead before you attempt thinking again. I think you've already pushed yourself a little far for the week.
"power"? The word you are looking for is velocity. And the 2000lb engine is already doing 500+mph when released, it's not accelerating to 500+mph. The question is how much distance does it require (all relevant factors considered) to come to a rest from 500+mph decelerating to 0mph and assuming it became detached and airborne again on impact with no other decrease or increase of force acting on it.
The properties of air do not change as the speed of the object increases. At least not at this speed. You, in what is a painful to watch attempt at appearing to have some semblance of intelligence, are trying to describe resistance and drag.
Seriously... do you try to be retarded? I mean, after a while it starts to seem this all has to be an act. Are you, Paul Markham, Bittiebucks and DVDTimes part of some underground British club who's primary goal is to prank unsuspecting webmasters by pretending to be indescribably stupid on internet forums?
|
I'm fairly certain Gary doesn't have even a sixth grade education. He doesn't even make sense half of the time speaking in his mother language. Trying to educate him is a total and complete waste of time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArsewithClass
Watch this & learn about weight, speed & projectory, velocity & everything else that goes together to
|
I mean come on, he doesn't even know the difference between mass and weight. He honestly does think that air "gets thicker" as objects move faster. Not to mention his calculations use an unknown factor called projectory.