Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
you do realize your just copying the chat site model right
they pay less to affiliates in commission too
wow you discovered what every one knew years ago.
|
No I'm adapting the chat model to fit the paysite one.
The object of a girl on a chat site is to get a single customer, at a time, into a higher priced 1-1 chat and show.
This is to keep 1,000s of surfers converting and rebilling by giving them something above what they currently get. The object isn't for the girl to get viewers to spend money, they have already spent money by joining the site. It's to chat with them, keep them happy and learn more about what they like and don't like. We do very little of that above comments below a scene. How is that better than comments to a real live person?
Yes the model of a girl chatting with viewers isn't new, but am I the only one who sees the cross over?
If cost is the only thing that stops people trying it, then this industry isn't as rich as it makes out. It has been done before, on solo girl sites and works beautifully. If the site can afford to keep the girl interested in working. Many simply can't.
I see a different side of the business than you will as an affiliate. Affiliates get the view of an industry with loads of money to spend on them. The content side gets a view of an industry with little money to spend on the product.
To get a good girl model to work exclusive on a site she doesn't own is going to cost $50,000 a year. That's minimum for a good girl here. LA porn girl more. Bad girls are cheap, but who wants to join a site with a bad girl on? How many sites do you know that offer a girl that kind of money, like the exclusive girls offline porn has?
My idea is for girls with a broad mind, nice looks, personality and want to keep their clothes on. Cost comes plummeting down.
Would you want to send traffic to a site with a live girl chatting to members or a site without one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
This guy is like a 1800's texas cowboy arguing with Enzo Ferrari about why horses are better than cars and how cars ruined the world. I can never really decide if it's really funny or just really sad. Usually it's a bit of both.
|
You're assuming Online porn has taken porn forward like the car took transport forward.
That's the stupidest assumption ever.
The stupid part is, you still have to pay for a car to enjoy one, people no longer have to pay for porn to enjoy it.