Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
No I'm adapting the chat model to fit the paysite one.
The object of a girl on a chat site is to get a single customer, at a time, into a higher priced 1-1 chat and show.
This is to keep 1,000s of surfers converting and rebilling by giving them something above what they currently get. The object isn't for the girl to get viewers to spend money, they have already spent money by joining the site. It's to chat with them, keep them happy and learn more about what they like and don't like. We do very little of that above comments below a scene. How is that better than comments to a real live person?
|
have you joined a solo site in the last couple years, virtually every pornstar official site has weekly chats for the members
that model is already established. you didn't adapt anything to the paysite model
Quote:
Yes the model of a girl chatting with viewers isn't new, but am I the only one who sees the cross over?
If cost is the only thing that stops people trying it, then this industry isn't as rich as it makes out. It has been done before, on solo girl sites and works beautifully. If the site can afford to keep the girl interested in working. Many simply can't.
I see a different side of the business than you will as an affiliate. Affiliates get the view of an industry with loads of money to spend on them. The content side gets a view of an industry with little money to spend on the product.
To get a good girl model to work exclusive on a site she doesn't own is going to cost $50,000 a year. That's minimum for a good girl here. LA porn girl more. Bad girls are cheap, but who wants to join a site with a bad girl on? How many sites do you know that offer a girl that kind of money, like the exclusive girls offline porn has?
My idea is for girls with a broad mind, nice looks, personality and want to keep their clothes on. Cost comes plummeting down.
|
the problem isn't the concept paul, like i said it currently exist in 100s of pay sites right now
it the implementation
if a girl was that good a draw to the paysite model she would make 10-20 times more money hustling for 1:1 in a chat site. You can't compete with those offers, so it is designed to fail.
Your completely missing the point of the competition in the marketplace
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Just realised why GG doesn't like my idea, hard to steal live stuff.
Silly me, I'm getting slower.  |
paul do a search
i have said the solution is 5 parts
1. doing watermarks correctly
2. branding bugs
3. doing live interaction correctly
4. setting up private tracker correctly
5 doing product placement correctly
i have said it for more then 4 years now
i understand how important live interaction is new model, i also know what the right WAY to do it is.