Dig points out that different porn turns on different people. Still there are fundamental basic.
Crap loud music that offers nothing to the scene isn't on many peoples "preferred" list.
As would be faked orgasm that all look the same and the same tired phrases spoken, when a guy opens his mouth in a porn scene, it better be gay and he better be about to suck cock.
The reason for this is often the shooter's or director's inability to get across to the model how to work.
Quote:
Still the basic presentation of most sites is just a pile of porn with little linking one scene to the next. It doesn't have to be a storyline like Porn Valley produces, getting that right requires major budgets that are beyond most sites. It just need the linking of scenes.
Sandra came for a days shoot, I filmed her walking to the shoot, then doing the shoot, then knocked out by the pleasure she had, the next scene could of been her in the bath soaking off her sweat and the final scene making herself and the crew a tea in the kitchen and getting off while she does it. Each scene is linked, it shows Sandra working for the day, I shot some BTS content that would of been nice to offer customers as an add on.
Don't throw every scene up in a day or a few days, put them up one a week. Then members have a reason to stay.
Do the members like Sandra more than the next girl, do they want SANDRA back? and how can we present Sandra in a way that keeps members glued? And not just Sandra, this goes for all the girls, let members vote on the scene and the girl, even better still with a live girl chatting to them she can chat when they want to and ask if they would like her back, what they want her to do and about their reactions to scenes.
For those in marketing, that's what marketing is about. Finding out by talking to customers. How often do we talk to members inside a site?
Today the porn consumer has 1,000s of sites to choose from and the game is 100 times tougher. We need to step up our game from the days of 2000.
Working on the product today is essential, adding 1-3 more scenes the same as the site already has is in itself boring for members. It all becomes the same and before long, the member is off to other sites. A lot of thought, hard work money has been spent to get him to sign up and then little done to keep him in there.
That's what this thread is about, not the past, my inabilities or what we do today. It's about tomorrow.
|
Let's assume Konda is right for a moment and the money is the same. Well today instead of 1,000 porn companies and 10,000 employed. Theres 10,000 and 100,000 employed. Not sure about the number neither is anyone else. Still today the cake is very very thin and has to be cut into tiny pieces. He's still wrong, think about the number of times a decent video was reproduced and the sales price, then double it by adding rental and cable. 1998 figures not 2011.