View Single Post
Old 09-20-2011, 07:33 PM  
lagcam
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diomed View Post
They did it for this reason:

Seller: Sells the product, receives payment, but waits to leave feedback.

Buyer: Doesn't like the product, leaves negative feedback

Seller: In turn, leaves the buyer negative feedback, for leaving him negative feedback

Now: Both people have negative feedback, neither likes it, and now the Seller has a much LARGER chance of getting the feedback neutral and removed.

Alot of seller's leave negative feedback to every person who left them negative feedback, regardless of payment received quickly and no problems from the buyer.

CASE CLOSED.
The feedback system has been flawed long term. People are scared to leave negative feedback because they know they will get it back, and so everybody waits for each other's feedback first.

If I buy something, I pay immediately. If the seller doesn't give me the positive feedback that I am due, I won't give them feedback no matter how good the purchase was.

Process should be forced that the seller should give the feedback first as the buyer did his part of the transaction first.
lagcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote