Quote:
Originally Posted by porno jew
god shut up man there are dozens of high quality websites that are loved by surfers and make loads of sales every day.
|
Dozens out of 10,000s.
God please, don't shut up I enjoy your humor.
So is it time to look beyond just the videos and images?
Met-Art are good photographers. Maybe we should see more of the whole sets and videos before making an assumption on the package.
But they prove my theory works. If you have a great product, you sell much better. Stopping at just that is 1998. We need to up our game.
Is it time to turn the dozens of loved sites into 1,000s and figure out how to do it to convert more of your traffic?
The problem for 95% of this industry is they were never willing or able to spend what Met Art
do all the time.
Actually at my average I sold to magazines, a market that paid up to 10 times what 95% of this market will pay. Met-Art to my knowledge didn't sell in the market we sold to. Comparing 2 different fields.
Compare Met-Art with Suze Randall and you have something comparable.
http://hegre-art.com/films
Here's a scene that was created by people who were on a lot more than $500 a solo girl scene and told to shoot 5 in a day. Why not apply the professional good budget Met-Art model of creating a product to the more popular forms of porn. Not the glamor style, all styles. Most of the porn today is created on a much different model and why ratios suck.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Django
TheSquealer for President 
|
He's brighter than Palin, but dumber than Bush. So his chances are great. LOL