Quote:
Originally Posted by EukerVoorn
Paul I totally agree with you, we're still on the same page. I don't want to bash Twistys though, they have an unique recognizable style. I agree though that they should select their series more carefully. I've seen series with 30 close-ups of the vagina in a row. Apart from that... they do what they do and they made some great fetish videos wich I find surprisingly good.
|
As you've been around 20 years, you'll know how well magazines paid shooters. The competition to get in was fierce. If we submitted a set with the same shot repeated over and over again, it was thrown back at us. There's simply no need to repeat the same pose over and over again, even a picture of a pussy, how many times do you need to look at it? When it's the same pose with no pussy, you know the shooter isn't working properly.
Another elementary mistake is framing of wide screen video. Shooters are shooting girls standing, sitting or kneeling too much in wide screen format. The result is a scene which is often 50% to 70% the room. They need to shoot more her in the positions best suited for Wide Screen framing, laying, on all fours or on her side.
Also screens today are wide. Many shooters still shoot in portrait mode. Not right.
Quote:
|
As for investing in productions: I shoot a lot of different things from very mild to very extreme and pay models up to 5000 euro per day, cash. I fly them in from all over the world, including the USA. Many people told me, and still tell me, I'm crazy. But when paying models that kind of crazy money, they'll do anything you ask them to do, they push their own limits, and they'll keep doing it till 4 in the morning if neccessary to get the shoot done. My customers love what I shoot, they see gorgeous girls doing the filthiest stuff, and this is what porn is all about, and should be about. Being a good pornographer means you have to have the guts and be willing and be capable of re-inventing porn. Nobody is interested in copy cats. Remember the first Andrew Blake movie? Great stuff. How long did it take before other producers copied his style (black and white shots, slow motion, pans and tilts?)? And it was all CRAP!
|
That's simply out side most sites budgets. The want to pay $300 to $500 for a solo girl scene. This is why so many sites fail to retain. They don't spend the money Met Art do.
Quote:
|
I agree on the piracy problem but we have to continue trying fighting it, or else! We need to do the things I listed in my previous post about preventing piracy. I agree though that if your neigbor doesn't do anything against it, it still affects you. Why would people pay for YOUR porn if they can get your neigbors porn FOR FREE elsewhere?
|
Fighting is fine, we need to also compete with it.
Quote:
|
I also agree on the LIVE thing. It's something I want to add to my sites soon. Pirates can never steal that from you, and they can never duplicate it, because they don't have the skills to produce. That's why they became pirate parasites in the first place :-)
|
It's another good reason to sign up and stay signed up.
Quote:
|
Has there been any kind of parasite in recent history that humans weren't able to get rid off or at least control it?
|
Many. Ever seen a mosquito?
