Originally Posted by Supz

You should go back and read again. I didn't call anyone stupid. I based what I said on the article I read, and I did not bitch. Based on the article I read, this is the facts I had. It is very possible the journalists who wrote the article I read had no idea what they were talking about. I never claimed to be a poker journalist. I just stated that I had no issues getting my money back from them, even when my account was suspended and no one I know has ever had any trouble getting money, and I know quite a few people that played on there. As soon as the poker sites got turned off in the US. I stopped paying attention and had no desire to care. Sorry if you were offended by me telling my opinion based on the facts that I had. But I wasn't just talking out of my ass, since that is what you are getting at.

Originally Posted by Supz

I am not sure how they classify this as a Ponzi scheme. It just makes no sense what they are writing. They just used the money that was in the account when they said all the accounts were seperate and it wasnt. I have never heard of anyone having a problem getting money out of there. They banned my account because one of my friends who had sent me money on there in the past did a chargeback on them and they still sent me my balance. I know a lot of people who cashed out a lot of money from there, in the 6 figure range and never had an issue getting money. Did anyone say they didnt get there money out of there?

Originally Posted by Supz

well, it is there job to skim money. that is how you earn money being the house in poker. It is called Rake. every player knows this. a portion of the pot goes to the house. But I know 100's of people that played on there before it was banned in the US and no one ever got beat on money.

Originally Posted by Supz

In the articles I've read, that is not what was stated. This is why I was saying that.

I would assume they would owe some players in the US money, the government seized there US domain names.