View Single Post
Old 09-28-2011, 07:24 AM  
Doug of Montreal
Confirmed User
 
Doug of Montreal's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far-L View Post
Sorry to be off topic but we need our review updated - who is the best person to ping about that?
I've added you to Skype. We'll get you hooked up ;)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Dave View Post
We know what customers want, download and stream and it is usually the opposite of what review sites score for.
They want options, that's for sure. Our old criteria only gave points for downloads. Now streaming is weighted equally.

Quote:
Originally Posted by amateurcanada View Post
In all fairness what video format is requiring 8000kbps. If this is for DVD quality 640x480 content its a bit much - but for HD 1080p/i then this is a good bar to set to avoid people smashing in shat content.
Quality is improving and it will continue to do so. 8K might be a bit ahead of the curve right now, but in ten years time it won't be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeHugeMovies View Post
That guy Doug is really an asshole! LOL =]
I am such a dick. Somebody please put me out of my misery. And are you doing any shows any more? I haven't seen you in a long bloody time!

Quote:
Originally Posted by GARY LEE View Post
I've been solicited by rabbit review several times to do a review of one of my sites. Each time I set up passwords and got them the info. Each time I was put on the ignore list. If anyone from Rabbits reads this don't bother sending me an email saying your sorry about the mix up and lets try it again. I will just ignore you no matter what you say.
No emails will be forthcoming. If you can't figure out how to add a guy to Skype or ICQ and get business done, I'm afraid you only have yourself to blame.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7 View Post
Is the quality of video just the bit-rate at which it is encoded ? No, it is the sum of many factors, as can be seen in professional film production. What does it matter what the competition is doing? A real review site would take all factors of quality into account. The more effort a producer makes the lower you score them. This does a disservice to the punter and the industry. That fact that 8000+ bit-rate movies won't play on most computers makes the scoring just mad.
To your points...

I) No, bitrate doesn't tell the whole picture, but it does tell a large part of it. And it's the only part which is easily quantifiable. Our review should cover the rest.
II) What does it matter what the competition is doing? Are you serious? Looking at what they're doing is a really good way someone like yourself can learn. And as you've said, there's a lot about this Internet thing that you just don't know.
III) We score people lower who work harder? Um, no. That's just not true.
IV) If 8k doesn't play on your computer, burn it to a DVD. Our reviews aren't for you. They are for connoisseurs who realize the bar is constantly being raised and they want to enjoy their passion in it's fullest.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesouth View Post
Review sites are worthless just wankers wanting free porn a real review site will pay just like a customer, then you know its legit and not playing favorites
If there's something that's out of place on our site with a review, we're happy to fix it. We try and do this honestly. And I think our review criteria now basically allows for more transparency than any other site. It's detailed so wanking is kept to a minimum.
__________________
WANT TRAFFIC? Get reviewed!

SKYPE: dougrabbit ICQ (only if you don't have SKYPE!): 267359201 Twitter: @DougOfRabbits
Doug of Montreal is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote