Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy
I too complain when others fail to meet my low standards ...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal
Ah Cherry! And I had thought our half-hour discussion on this in London over the weekend would have softened the blow! (okay, i knew there was no chance in hell you were going to understand what I was telling you, but I gave it the ole college try)
At any rate, this is a much better idea of what the competition is doing out there. If it surprises you, you should probably give your head a shake. I know you said you are a production guy. It doesn't surprise me that you're surprised by all of this. This industry is changing. Our criteria is changing as a result. Adapt or... 
We'd make a lot more money if that was the case. It's just not so at our shop. |
Doug, I know your review site gives very worthy reviews... I was told which niche our sites were rather than placing them where I felt best.
You're choices were more for the review & the surfer than for the sale
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesouth
Review sites are worthless just wankers wanting free porn a real review site will pay just like a customer, then you know its legit and not playing favorites
|
Free porn??? they click porn & check a load of tubes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
As when I met you, you are ignoring the points I made.
Is the quality of video just the bit-rate at which it is encoded ?
No, it is the sum of many factors, as can be seen in professional film production.
What does it matter what the competition is doing?
A real review site would take all factors of quality into account.
The more effort a producer makes the lower you score them.
This does a disservice to the punter and the industry.
That fact that 8000+ bit-rate movies won't play on most computers makes the scoring just mad.
|
I agree that all the points that you have made about the review of content from a website should be taken into account. However, if a producer puts his heart & sole into their productions, it's not the main factor considering it could be a great scene, yet cant be enjoyed if it's been encoded low... as a positive note, why not encode your new footage or encode your older footage in higher rates? Then you would get the best of both worlds
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjlover
It wouldn't matter what bit rate you used, you would still be showing some of the, if not the, worst porn (well what you think is porn, but punters don't) anyway
Rabbits is a private business, they owe you nothing. If you don't like what they say, don't do business with them.
simple |
What does it matter what you think!? You chat crap & obviously are a troll with a second name on GFY, and heres betting you own very lousy sites & content yourself!
Get that sig removed, its the ban hammer for you, considering all my models have always been paid!