Quote:
Originally Posted by ArsewithClass
It does... We offer our models the chance to come into a studio with decent lighting & equiptment, a good broadband connection, the equiptment ready to use & not having tech problems, if there is problems, it's dealt with. We deal with cleaning & most of all, the profiles are kept up to date & making money from our work. The model has to do one job, her job 
I suppose it's like the choice of going out for a meal or cooking yourself.... the difference is, you would eat out every day if it wasn't for the money & time... working in our studio, the models have all the benefits & only lose a very small fee when working on commissions... Of course, placing the models on a basic as I said a lot of the British studios do, the model knows she is being paid as she would on a shoot. For these positive reasons, I do not think a model would want to go direct through mfc or any other cam site  |
How do you address it when a model points out that she could go direct? Obviously, I'm a webmaster, so I understand what benefit a studio is bringing, way above and beyond whether the chat host needs to be supplied with a cam/location or has one already. But, in my experience of other areas of the business, that sort of thing is not always easy to communicate to talent, and I like everyone to be happy with a deal, so this is frustrating. And some of the cam studio payout structures look likely to make this sort of thing even more of an issue.