Quote:
Originally Posted by Sly
I read about it last night and this morning on another news source before reading this Fox article. The other article said almost the exact same things this Fox article is saying, so I'm clueless what this particular Fox article has to do with anything.
I've also read your other replies about it being the opposite of the 99% after you described who the 99% are. That's not a definition, that is a broad spectrum of people.
Hey if this movement thinks they are going to accomplish actual goals by doing these protests, have at it. I am merely suggesting they pick specific actual targets, focus all energy on those targets, and tear them down. This energy could turn over Congress in 2012, but they would need to get started on it now. Primaries are soon.
|
Odd, the articles above all say something a little different... I wonder why they all focused in on 30 people causing problems and not the other 3000? Maybe to twist the truth a little?
99% is a broad spectrum of people, the 1% is not... the 1% is very easy to define.
They've already accomplished many goals... people like 12clicks are talking about it, which means he's paying attention.. goal #1 reached. They've also gotten bankers, investment corps, etc to start talking, even big ceo's have took notice, even spoken about it.. so clearly, they are accomplishing things.