Quote:
Originally Posted by TACNet
My advice is pick ONE site and stick with it. If you have a network, then put all the sites on one domain and push that domain. (eg http://www.tacamateurs.com )
Its FAR better to have one big site ranked on places like google than to have lots of little sites ranked way down.
Id also take the $250 youve earned and re-invest ALL of it in buying fresh traffic. Keep doing that for 6 months or so before you take any money out yourself.
Most importantly stick at pushing the ONE site. Dont be tempted to start launching lots of little sites as they wont make a bean. You really can be earning tens of thousands per MONTH in this game. It can take years but you'll get there
Good luck |
While I think this wouldn't have been the ideal strategy in the past, and therefore technically wrong, I think it may be the best strategy moving forward. If there's one lesson to be learned from Panda, it's that you don't want to ever see yourself in a situation where your looking back in time wondering what the fuck you did wrong or find yourself sitting there with your hand on your cock trying to decode the new algo. Rather than being perpetually one step behind, and maybe this is just the chess player in me talking, but I think it's better to anticipate what Google will do next and be proactive instead of reactive. With that being said, my guess is that the next update will put a greater weight on internal linking. When buying links, starting crap websites to linkback to your main site, doing link exchanges etc., you can do so without regard to what effect it will have on your shitty feeder site, or the person selling links, or your b and d of your abcd exchange or whatever the fuck, but if you link crap to yourself, you're effectively shitting on yourself, so it's only reasonable to assume that you're links to yourself are not crap and if this holds true, having a big site gives you a virtual army of pages for a strategic non-crap internal linking strategy.