Quote:
Originally Posted by cordoba
I mean relatively, considering that the reasons 'you can't make money from porn anymore' - abundance of free amateur stuff and theft on tubes and forums, doesn't apply to the webcam genre.
If you want to chat live to a sexy girl there aren't many free sites that can guarantee it.
So how come webcam sponsors don't convert like porn did in 1999?
I used to have a site that was first page of Google for loads of key terms, including 'webcam girls', and it still only made one or two sales a day at 1:800
I know a lot of people do better than that, but I read a lot of other webmasters here grumbling that cams can be difficult to convert. Just wondering why that should be.
|
Webmasters can grumble about being difficult to convert, or they can talk to me, we have 15 years of stats and a support staff, we me and Matt, that don't mind sharing the results of those stats. We convert better now than we did in 1999, but then we've been in business since 1996.
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that