Quote:
Originally posted by Diamond Jim
Any judge is going to look at the fact that Sobe has been selling this content for some time with Joe's clear knowledge, and that there was no dispute until the price was slammed into the ground. He will not need any documentation to prove he has a license to resell.
But if there is copyrighted music in those videos, he (and much worse, the webmasters who have purchased the content) stand to get a good fucking....
Sobe, was is the real deal? I want to buy but wouldn't touch anything with copyrighted music in it with a ten foot pole.
|
actually, you are wrong.
if let`s say SONY has a contract stating that everyone who buy their CD`s are not to be copied...
but Joe Blow goes there and buys, on a personnal deal, 1 of each ... BUT all that Joe Blow does in his company is copy CDS....
Do you think the Judge will say : "Oh, well, Sony should have known JOE Blow copies Cd`s because this is all they do."
NO... it doesn`t work this way... they go for whatever contract is in WRITTEN, which supersedes any prior or further ORAL contract... as its a tangible proof, and not a I said this, you said that...
it`s always easier to keep your head high and settle your issues like business man and come to an agreement... going to court will cost you both, instead of making you both money.