Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
the first 2 sites looked like crap. Uninspiring, amateur and all the bloody same. Typical for cam sites.
The girls look like they were just plonked onto a bed with minimum training. One has her head out of shot, none of them look at the camera, the screen is in the wrong place, it should be in front of the girl with the camera in between the screen and girl. So she's not looking off to my side as she chats.
The keyboard should be placed just below the camera.
Al this so she looks at me while chatting.
Also girls should be trained to smile, to lure ad to catch the surfers into her net.
This is fundamental selling. Which these girls don't have a clue about.
Sandro's sites look like a place to trust.
|
I asume you are comapring F4F, Xlovecams and DirectChat (Sandros sites) here?
If yes then I have years of stats here to back up that what you say here doesnt matter as much (if any) as you think it does.
Trust me, when people say you should stick to commenting about photography they are right. You have no stats to back up what ever claim you make. You only have your opinion. Thats great but I would leave the real cam marketing to the pros. What you think is fundamental for a great cam site is actually not that important.
Start promoting some cam sites and report back in a year from now with some proper stats. Untill then I would strongly suggest to leave this game to the pros.
Unless you like being ridiculled, laughed at and just love to bore people with walls of text
