Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
OK, I lied. One more response. You keep changing your question. now we are back to your first question.
My last post was in response to this statement by you :"no record company has ever plowed money into the promotion of an unknown band"
I have a list there that clearly makes that statement false.
You don't need to respond. I don't really care what your response is, it will likely be you once again changing the question.
|
so the only way you respond is to deliberately cut my sentance in half
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
no record company has ever plowed money into the promotion of an unknown band
every band had to go thru years of paying back all advances BEFORE they ever got the push that would allow them play major stadiums and ONLY then did they ever get an advance so big they couldn't pay it back.
|
there no period there buddy boy it all one sentence
even so your still misrepresenting again, by definition if they became a smash success after the limited money push on the single
they are no longer UNKNOWN
at that point that is investment in an established success.
Artist-fill-in-name-here your first single sold so well your now a major success we could pay 2 million in royalties but we are going to spend half that money on the rest of your album is not nor will it ever be investing in an unknown band/artist.