Quote:
Originally Posted by PornerBros
Here's my thoughts:
compared to MW2, BF2 had a really mediocre campaign, forgettable characters, unrealistic AI(being spotted from 700 yards, while hiding behind a metal sheet, while hidden in a cloud of smoke isn,t my defenition of "realistic gameplay", it's called "cheap"
Next: about multi. you spend MINUTES running around and being sniped because you spawned in the middle of a warzone, or worst, you,re being raised by a medic who rape/rez your for the whole sake of grabbing extra xp off your dead body. Both games have different pacing. if you like to play in teams, then try BF3 but good luck finding a team with serious players that actually PLAY in teams.
COD is way more fast-action oriented.
Then again...  because my clan is already chosen |
Spot on.
MW is a fast paced loner game.
BF is a team game and dont "expect" to win unless you roll teamwork.
Last night me and two friends dominated each and every conquest game(cept one) because we just used call outs and teamwork. quad capping all night long.