Quote:
Originally posted by SoBeGirl Video
So I guess you can say that the problem here is that it is Joe?s word against mine but I think the facts are obvious. I have been selling this content for about a year now. Only now does Joe claim I don?t have rights to sell it. I claim I do and I have invoiced for purchase from SoBeGirl (which is a company that does nothing but sell content) to prove it.
|
Yeah I guess you have him there.
Now if only you had some cashed check stubs paying him for resale roylaties or whatever - you'd be golden. At least that would establish there was a verbal agreement for resale.
But I don't think the asumption that "I am sobegirl - why would I buy content for website use?" would fly for a second in a courtroom. Maybe AMA (or any content provider for that matter) has content that you yourself can not produce, or a different region of models or something... but just to say "I have my own content business -- it should be implied that I will resell this content" -- dunno man.
Here's a bad analogy of your logic here ---
let's say you own Dodge (the whole company, not just the neon
), but you buy a few different Mercedes models from Mercedes - at current market prices.
Does this give you manufacture rights to those Mercedes models?... just because Mercedes
knew you owned another auto manufacturer company & sold them to you anyway?