Quote:
Originally Posted by PiracyPitbull
I guess I'm not as easily impressed as you.
People have been synthesizing with their voice for decades. He still has to record each track separately as seen on the Ellen Degenres show where he was covered the singing part only and all the other tracks were pre-recorded and digitized on the screen behind him.
So when it comes to 'talent" , what do I have?..... a singer basically. Or he could record the singing part and cover an individual part, like the Tom-toms or something.
Its not exactly blowing my mind here.
|
no matter who little it impresses you it a lot more innovative as your copy catting of someone else business model.
Quote:
|
Unlike yourself Gideon, I have skin in the adult game and have been DMCA'ing since I got into adult 8 years ago. I've helped other webmasters find their material for years but ultimately, charging a nominal sum to do it (now that its so widespread and can't be monitored on a casual basis) for others who don't have the time makes logical sense on both parts. Are you saying every business needs to ask others in the same niche whether its ok to do what they were doing anyway?
|
nope remember i am the guy arguing in favor of the right of making derivative work without having to beg for permission first.
you were the person who argued against it
interesting how you seem to have a problem with the same rules applied to your business
copying your competitors entire business process,adding nothing new whatsoever is ok when your the copycat
but
copying someone else "words" while making sure that it different enough that it doesn't cost the original artist a sale isn't.