Quote:
Originally Posted by PiracyPitbull
I didn't object to fair use. I was responding to another persons post and you jumped in with comments on derivative works.
|
this was your statement about covers
Quote:
Originally Posted by PiracyPitbull
I don't have a problem with "approved or sample cleared" music.
And there's nothing in the proposed Act which says that you cannot apply for the required clearances from the copyright owner if you wish to use their creation for cover or sample purposes.
|
you clearly said that you don't have a problem with approved or sample cleared music
fair use is not approved
by definition it apply to content even if the copyright holder doesn't want you use it.
It is THE ONLY defined exclusion to the exclusive rights of the copyright holder
there are no others.
Quote:
|
There you go comparing apples and oranges again.
|
then explain yourself, fair use is the only exclusion to the exclusive rights of the copyright holder
All the marketing material produced by remove your content was all protected by copyright
why does fair use allow you to use their worlds in the same way they did in their copyright protected work
but musicians don't have the same right when those words are put in a song.