View Single Post
Old 11-09-2011, 03:04 PM  
PiracyPitbull
Confirmed User
 
PiracyPitbull's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
this was your statement about covers


you clearly said that you don't have a problem with approved or sample cleared music

fair use is not approved

by definition it apply to content even if the copyright holder doesn't want you use it.
It is THE ONLY defined exclusion to the exclusive rights of the copyright holder

there are no others.
I don't have a problem with approved or sample cleared music.

What does that have to do with my opinion on piracy, fair use and any proposed new law.....If something like SOPA passes and people out there still want to do covers, parodys etc, whats stopping them.

If they can't find a website prepared to risk hosting what they're doing, can't they just host it themselves ?




Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
then explain yourself, fair use is the only exclusion to the exclusive rights of the copyright holder

All the marketing material produced by remove your content was all protected by copyright

why does fair use allow you to use their worlds in the same way they did in their copyright protected work

but musicians don't have the same right when those words are put in a song.
Apples/oranges
__________________
http://www.piracypitbull.com
PiracyPitbull is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote