Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrob
The party making the allegations of copyright violation are not given immunity from damages. Only those who act on those allegations in good faith are given immunity.
Therefore, if you make false accusations against a website that has all legal content, you may be sued for damages by those adversely affected.
Sounds reasonable to me. 
Just my opinion.  |
read it again it doesn't say service provider of the infringing site it simply says service provider
remove your content would also be a service provider (of the copyright holder)
copyright holder tasks a service provider to do all the work
that service provider "accidentally" takes down a legit site
the service provider immunity kicks in because the law grants it to all service providers not just the service providers of he rogue site
btw you again dodged the question
if you truely beleived it impossible to abuse why are you so against putting a clause that says you lose your copyright if you ever abuse it.
if your arguement that it infringement is dead wrong, you now have to live under the rules you think are fair for everyone else to live under.