Quote:
Originally Posted by raymor
It's a wise man who gets feedback to double check his own point of view, and does so without causing unnecessary drama naming names.
Something isn't right with that if it's one of the popular CMS systems.
It sounds to me like they are misunderstanding what you're referring to or something. That or perhaps the "references to a previous client's brand" actually aren't quite what you think they are or something.
I say that because hearing your point of view, it sounds like they are being total dicks. The dicks selling CMS systems went out of business though. Running through all the major CMS vendors, that seems out of character for all them whom I know, and I know most of them.
Since you are soliciting feedback, if you care to let one objective industry veteran see the details before naming names publicly, I'd be glad to take a look. I'm a little curious where the communication break down or what ever occurred.
|
They are not one of the top tier, as i already work with most of the other popular systems, i think they are trying but missing the mark in a number of ways.
Top tier companies wouldnt deliver product like this and then bill to fix it or they would get slammed on the boards.
You are correct there was a communication break down.
Shortly after they installed the system my entire host (not server) REALITY CHECK went totally down and i lost the fresh install and took months for me to get back on track with all my other projects so they did a fresh install months later and since then nearly everything that wasnt working and there was lots even after the fresh install was labeled as "your teams fault" by developer.
This is exactly what i hope/expect to avoid when i pay well for something.