Quote:
Originally Posted by gleem
Wrong, you can maintain 2257 exemption removing content after the fact via flags, complaints etc.. but when you are picking what to post, adding editorial content like he does with titles, nifty animated gif commentaries, then he's just full blown editing. My lawyer (Larry Walters / firstammendment.com) told me that would make you 2257 liable no matter where you hosted the content if you were in the US, and couldn't be defended in court.
|
As you can see I made an edit after my stupid ass clicked the link and saw what he was doing. I doubt an editorial on a video that was actually published by an end user would matter as much but like you said he's actively picking an image and posting about it. I agree with you and knew about the complaints etc, just didn't want to get too wordy. Silly people.
__________________
Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life
"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."