Quote:
Originally Posted by DotXXX
Don't you think that's just a little bit far reaching? As of right now the two key policies are relatively simple. No content that makes pedobear happy, and sites must be labeled (which is done automatically).
It is doubtful that .XXX will ever become mandatory, and ICM certainly isn't doing anything to even promote that as an idea.
What I really have a difficult time understanding is "So your whole business will be worthless at any time they choose to execute a stupid rule they come up with." Don't you think that the very idea, that a for-profit business would ever even consider intentionally doing anything to directly disenfranchise it's customer base, to be just a little bit ridiculous?
|
no it is not far reaching at all... it is drawing something out to an end that is a possibility even if it is a denied probability.