Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank21
No how can that be a joke?
We are being tricked in democracy and we get to vote, and slowly but by pre planned plan the system is becoming a dictatorship. While you still can vote your vote doesnt mean anything the system does whatever you want and whatever you vote.
It is very clear just by your intentions that you do want .XXX to become mandatory whatever you say does not matter since you and your organisation speaks with a double toung.
You say you THINK .XXX will not be mandatory therefore using this as argument isnt valid.
However you or your organisation states that it will be easy for parents to block porn by simply blocking .XXX sites on a PC, network or country.
Now this has totaly no use as only a small part of the sites is actualy on this .XXX extention.
So either you lie that you do not think .XXX will be mandatory or you lie by stating that anyone can block porn by blocking .XXX.
|
I'm going to skip the politics if that's alright?
Our intentions are simply to run a successful business venture, both for ICM and for .XXX domain owners, not to make our product mandatory. I said it was doubtful that .XXX would become mandatory, and that ICM is in no way promoting that it should be, so it's an entirely valid argument.
ICM's view on adult content and it's accessibility is quite clear. Rather than quote several long paragraphs of text, may I point you to about dot xxx and the subfolder of the same name?
Site labeling will make it easy for parents wishing to keep adult content away from their minor children will find it very easy to block the entire domain. Consumers wishing to find specific content that is of interest to them will find that easier to do as well, with clear and precise domain names as well as on search dot xxx.
If I didn't answer your concerns, please forgive me, but I'm having some difficulty understanding your argument.
