Thread: Cloud hosting?
View Single Post
Old 11-17-2011, 05:56 PM  
Supz
Arthur Flegenheimer
 
Supz's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaze View Post
Not true again, it is not more reliable it is supposed to be faster by being accessed in more locations. Do your home work before correcting people that know more then you.

Why do you only have two name servers? Try better dns like at least three in different global positions then ditch the cloud hype. It's a just a cheesy sales pitch and at this point more harm then good.

Unless you think you can run a network better then Amazon?

The main reason is several additional points of failure. More load, more hardware, all for what faster loading speeds? I will put our premium bandwidth against any cloud any day and be much faster most of the time.

BTW:

http://www.webslug.info/index/results

Winner
dwhs.net was faster by 2.8 seconds. It has won 100% of all encounters.

Average time to load over 8 tests was 0.6s
GALAXYVISIONS.COM

But your still faster then hostgator and dreamhosts sluggish network if that makes you feel better.

http://dwhs.net/
loaded in:
0.59s
Address:
http://dreamhost.com/
loaded in:
7.13s


Dreamhost is a nightmare and hostgator is about the same. Really worth saving a cup of coffee a month over people? Sorry for the rant but you have to wonder why people ruin business opportunities over a couple bucks.
You are like 3 years behind on technology my friend. You have no idea how Cloud is created, nor do you know what the technology consits of. And yes. I can build the same Cloud that Amazon has if I had there money. But I don't. I know more about cloud and virtualizaton in my left hand, then you know about hosting in general. You are making yourself look like a fool for anyone who knows about this technology, and you are supposed to be a hosting company. Not saying your shared accounts are not good. But you obviously do not host large enterprise customers.

I am certified in both VMware and Citrix. If you want me to scan my certificates for you, let me know. So I have done my homework. I have sold and built my share of private clouds to many private companies.

You truely have no idea what Cloud hosting is.

Here are some reason why people go virtual
-Less Power Consumption - usually around a 10 or 15 to 1 ration of physical server to virtual server
-Ease of management - creating a virtual server with Windows 2008 R2 takes about an hour from start to finish to roll out a new server. Good luck ordering new hardware, building it, installing the OS and having it online in less then 3 days if you dont have a spare server in stock
-High availability - Using VMware, you can use VMotion, DRS and HA to ensure if one physical host fails, the virtual servers will move to the other physical host automatically.
-Less switching infranstructure - You can also use virtual nic's with VMware and you can do inter VLan routing and switch management with the Cisco v1000 virtual switch on top of VMware
- Maximize hardware - If you take the average server, they usually use 10-15% of there resources (this is fact, look it up), which means you are paying for 85-90% of a server you will never use. This is a waste of money

This is just off the top of my head. I can go on. But again, you have no idea what Cloud is used for or what its made of.
Supz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote