GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

LeeNoga · 06-10-2003, 08:49 AM

Over 8 months of development, and we are ready to launch some technology that hopefully will be the pitbull our industry needs to reduce the money that is made by unethical webmasters.

We also understand sponsors don't always know where their traffic is coming from, and we can locate your banners and scrub the site for alerts etc.

Its complex, but do you think this will help our present problems?

Sniffy our pitbull was developed to sniff websites and do a deep scrub of affliliate programs, link lists, search engines etc. He checks everything as well as downloads all the images, hashes them and records the fingerprint in a database.

We are able to scrub sponsor programs based on any triggers they want or we use the triggers we know of [lolita, underage, young etc].

The ASACP and our technology have come to an agreement to work together since this technology has so many applications.

Sponsors, do you think this type of service has value to you to have a 3rd party agency sniffing your affiliates and policing their websites on a monthly fee basis?

We have other modules that cross reference this database, and we have taken on the huge task of downloading every image we can find on the net that is adult, to date we have over 5 million in our database.

Our solution to combatting unethical content/websites, is both a high tech and a low tech solution. The low tech side is a human reviewing the images on the webmasters site, as our system recognizes the images we never have to validate them again, so over time we will have less and less to view.

If a webmaster turns on some unethical content during certain times of the week and reverts it back to legit content, we know about it.

Nothing like this has been developed and we feel tools should be developed within our industry.

Any thoughts? Does this have value? If you were a sponsor would you pay a monthly feel for this police dog, we loving call "Sniffy"?

06-10-2003, 08:49 AM
LeeNoga Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Egg & Sperm Mutation Posts: 3,043	We developed technology to fight back Over 8 months of development, and we are ready to launch some technology that hopefully will be the pitbull our industry needs to reduce the money that is made by unethical webmasters. We also understand sponsors don't always know where their traffic is coming from, and we can locate your banners and scrub the site for alerts etc. Its complex, but do you think this will help our present problems? Sniffy our pitbull was developed to sniff websites and do a deep scrub of affliliate programs, link lists, search engines etc. He checks everything as well as downloads all the images, hashes them and records the fingerprint in a database. We are able to scrub sponsor programs based on any triggers they want or we use the triggers we know of [lolita, underage, young etc]. The ASACP and our technology have come to an agreement to work together since this technology has so many applications. Sponsors, do you think this type of service has value to you to have a 3rd party agency sniffing your affiliates and policing their websites on a monthly fee basis? We have other modules that cross reference this database, and we have taken on the huge task of downloading every image we can find on the net that is adult, to date we have over 5 million in our database. Our solution to combatting unethical content/websites, is both a high tech and a low tech solution. The low tech side is a human reviewing the images on the webmasters site, as our system recognizes the images we never have to validate them again, so over time we will have less and less to view. If a webmaster turns on some unethical content during certain times of the week and reverts it back to legit content, we know about it. Nothing like this has been developed and we feel tools should be developed within our industry. Any thoughts? Does this have value? If you were a sponsor would you pay a monthly feel for this police dog, we loving call "Sniffy"?