Quote:
Originally Posted by Connor
Creating some kind of link between legitimate adult content and child abusers seems odd, because one has NOTHING to do with the other.
|
After reading the article you have linked, I don't see anything that suggests IFFOR created a link between legitimate adult content and child abusers. Understand, I'm not pro .xxx or necessarily anti .xxx. But, what I gather from the article is that IFFOR will be active in the policing of .xxx for material that contains child abuse. As far as I know, no other extension has taken such a proactive role and it's been left to individuals and government organizations to do so. This doesn't seem like a negative to me. But, perhaps I'm not understanding correctly?