Quote:
Originally Posted by Failed
Just to play the devil's advocate here. How is what you're describing different than what the ASACP does now? If we're linking the wording of child protection with lumping the adult industry into the same group as child abusers, and the idea of a self-imposed penance or self-regulation, the ASACP does this right now.
Again, just playing devil's advocate.
|
Anyone know of a single child ASACP protected?
I'm assuming IFFOR will be the same shit. Lots of press, lots of meetings, no real doing anything of substantial value, and not a single child protected. Just another way to keep a group of people paid.