Originally Posted by Connor

Well that's a bit of a whole 'nother conversation, I wouldn't want to get off track because I expect that ASACP would cause a lot of emotions and opinions one way or another. I'll say this: the truth is, it was a little controversial when ASACP went the "child protection" route, and I and others expressed to them a belief this was a mistake. That said, one difference is that ASACP doesn't have the financial pockets that IFFOR does, meaning they couldn't affect us as deeply as IFFOR can. IFFOR is running massive ad campaigns ... according to one individual over there, they even ran a campaign on Major League Baseball ... which if true is amazing in it audacity. Also, ASACP never had and never will have (I don't think) the Washington connection that IFFOR has set up and will almost certainly grow and evolve.