|
One can argue the creativity of an homage or the validity of Marilyn Monroe pics Playboy re-published in its first issue being iconic of Playboy, but what is wrong with the images? They look like nice pictures of a pretty girl. Maybe not the most special nice pics of the most pretty girl ever. I like a little bigger ass and hips and obviously Photoshop can offer that. But it the shoot looks like overall nice work. Are people just bent about how much she reportedly got paid to do what seems sort of minimal or what?
|