View Single Post
Old 12-12-2011, 10:48 AM  
MrCain
Confirmed User
 
MrCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Failed View Post
What I don't understand about arguments such as this, is .com and other tlds have restrictions, and rules, as well. We've already seen the justice department confiscate domains, and even servers for that matter. With the new bills that are going to be hitting congress, we have no idea how .com will change. If we post a video of girl dancing to some background music, will they take our .com? What future bills will hit congress and effect the way we operate .coms? At this point, .xxx is at the very least looking like a safe bet against any .com changes that may come.
New laws will affect all tlds and hosting companies the US government has any influence over, that includes .xxx. Dotxxx is not safer than .com in that regard. On the contrary, while .com is subject to laws made by the US government, the .xxx tld is subject to the rules made by IFFOR and ICM Registry in addition to being subject to US laws.
__________________
Sigmund
MrCain is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote